Taskin Ahmed's Strategy to Dismiss Abdullah Shafiq
97 Repoter: 97author
Publish : 2 months agoUpdate: 1 second agoTaskin Ahmed's Strategy to Dismiss Abdullah Shafiq
Taskin Ahmed's Strategy to Dismiss Abdullah Shafiq
In the first Test in Rawalpindi, Taskin Ahmed was not part of the playing XI. However, after last playing a Test against Afghanistan in June of the previous year, this star fast bowler made a return in the series against Pakistan. On his comeback, he made an immediate impact by dismissing Pakistani opener Abdullah Shafiq in the very first over by breaking his stumps. Taskin went on to take two more wickets as Pakistan was bowled out for 274. In a press conference after the day's play, Taskin shared his excitement and plans following his first wicket.
The first day of the second Test in Rawalpindi was washed out due to rain. The toss was held a day later, and Bangladesh, opting to bowl first, achieved success in the very first over. On his comeback, Taskin Ahmed struck immediately by dismissing Abdullah Shafiq. Taskin elaborated on the strategy behind his first-over success:
"It (Shafiq’s wicket) was actually very enjoyable for me. I bowled five balls outside and then wanted to bring one ball in. I did this intentionally. I was very happy to take that wicket. Sometimes I might not take a wicket, but I need to stick to the process. I am learning continuously. I’ve been playing for the last 10 years, and this is how I keep learning."
With Taskin Ahmed's pace and Miraz’s spin magic, the visiting Bangladesh team did not allow Pakistan to last even a day in their first innings. The combined efforts of spin and pace led to five wickets falling before lunch, and Pakistan was eventually bowled out for 274 by the end of the day's final session.
At one point, Pakistan was 107 for 1, but then began to collapse. Taskin highlighted the key to Bangladesh's success in Rawalpindi:
"Initially, when we tried to attack, they scored runs and formed a good partnership. After lunch, we implemented our plans effectively, which is why we were able to restrict them to a relatively low total."